The subject line has more than one meaning...
I have created a Facebook event about this...
Copied & pasted from the description:
To anyone paying enough attention, it is obvious that the recent earthquake in Haiti was triggered. This was far from the first time secret technology has been used to mimic a natural disaster.Does this sound crazy? I feel it would be crazy to foresee such an event and not do anything to prevent it, and the suspicion that such an event is being planned is not unreasonable.
The technology has been developed over the course of several decades, and has already been used with precision -- how many times, we can't be sure.
Stay tuned for revisions to this post, forum entries, and chat.
...Image from Huffington Post:
By now you have heard about the 8.8 in Chile, which hit even as some of us were still talking in this site's chat. So far I have seen nothing to suggest this one was triggered...
It is important that we remain calm when events like these occur, keeping ourselves from jumping to conclusions. However we must also look for evidence pointing to them being 'other than natural'...
We do this of course in the absence of a reliable earthquake prediction system, at least one of which has been developed and heavily suppressed. It involved the monitoring of radio signals emitted by quartz crystals in rock and soil when under compression, and was impressive in its accuracy. It also was able to clearly show the difference between natural and triggered seismic events, so...
This update added on Saturday, February 27th, 2010. More updates to follow. Video link posted by a friend on Facebook:
This, for me, qualifies as evidence. Yes, that means I now have an opinion on whether the Chilean 8.8 was triggered: Signs point to YES.
Update added past midnight local time, 02/03 March 2010.
Apparently that was the name of Joe Stack's software engineering company, "Embedded Art". This morning he seems to have set his house on fire before heading to the local airport, getting into his own single-engine plane, and flying it into an office building in Austin, Texas -- but not before leaving a lenghty note, that (tragically) became a suicide note, on his website. I say "apparently" and "he seems to have" because we cannot trust ANY information blindly. However even as I type this, after having read the contents of that page myself, the story rings true. By the time I went to search for it, the site's content had been removed, replaced with only "This website has been taken offline due to the sensitive nature of the events that transpired in Texas this morning."
Not to be missed. Suggest downloading and watching more than once.
http://projectcamelot.org/aaron_mccollum.html

This week on Earth we have seen yet another example of Man's inhumanity to Man -- the artificially-induced earthquake in Haiti...
![]()
For what it's worth, here is the Wikipedia page on the event:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Haiti_earthquake
It goes without saying that we are extremely unlikely to see any mention on that page, at least anytime soon, of this having been anything other than a 'natural' disaster -- but some of us know enough to harbor strong suspicions.
At first I myself was merely in shock -- though I've been aware for several years that secret technology has been used to trigger seismic events in the past, I'd had no idea the island of Hispaniola was susceptible to seismic activity, and was taken off-guard. Besides, aren't we supposed to be expecting more and more 'Earth Changes'?
Ah, but someone mentioned it, and as much as I didn't want to, I began to see the light darkness...
Impacts of Establishing a Breakthrough New Energy Economy
Brian O’Leary and Wade Frazier, www.brianoleary.info and www.ahealedplanet.net, June 1, 2009,
in reply to the U.S. DoE/DARPA-E New Energy Grant solicitation, control number 25A5231.
“The world is at a crossroads. We can no longer afford to ignore the human impact of climate change.
This is a call to the negotiators to come to the most ambitious agreement ever negotiated or to continue
to accept mass starvation, mass sickness and mass migration on an ever growing scale.”
— Kofi Annan, former Secretary General of the United Nations,
Global Humanitarian Forum, May 29, 2009
“From now on, America’s top priority in the energy field must be to explore all potential components
of this new energy future and move swiftly to develop those with the greatest promise.”
— Prof. Michael T. Klare, Foreign Policy in Focus, June 28, 2008
“The resistance to a new idea increases as the square of its importance.”
— Bertrand Russell
Abstract
There is evidence that breakthrough clean energy proofs-of-concepts could lead to a new energy economy that
would provide a sustainable future for all of humanity and nature. Because this possibility has been ignored by
mainstream science, due to limiting scientific assumptions, and suppressed by an energy industry vested in
unsustainable practices, it has been difficult for the public to recognize the enormous potential of new energy
sources or to understand how they could be researched, developed, and implemented in practical ways. We
propose assembling an advisory group to the DoE to make recommendations about R&D programs and to
suggest a realistic transition to a new energy economy. We also propose polling the public about their attitudes
toward a future of breakthrough clean energy. This overall effort, including the activities of the advisory group,
would be largely voluntary—in harmony with the nature of “free” energy.
Introduction
Over the past century, the world has witnessed hundreds of demonstrations of a variety of breakthrough clean
energy concepts, whether it be energy from the vacuum (“zero-point”), cold fusion, or special hydrogen and
water chemistries in the presence of catalysts. Any one of these concepts, if properly developed, promises a
world of clean energy abundance. Yet mainstream scientists, corporations, governments and media have ignored
and suppressed these proofs-of-concepts before they’ve been put to practical use. Most decision-makers and
public spokespeople deny the very possibility that a breakthrough clean, cheap and decentralized energy culture
could ever evolve, because this would appear to violate existing scientific principles. But we have witnessed
many demonstrations of the viability of these possibilities. We believe that many of these concepts are viable if
the required R&D and deployment were carried out under public sponsorship. If responsibly managed, the
adoption of these concepts could lead civilization to a culture of abundance.
1
Image of Autonomous Robot From Second Grand Challenge Advancing to Urban Challenge (Wikipedia).
I've been fairly quiet of late, as I go farther and farther down the rabbit hole, wondering if the revelations will ever stop. I'd like to thank (not blame) Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot for this...
Thanks to their interviews and links, I've been exposed to quite a bit of new material -- and it's taking a while to digest. Not everyone has the time to dedicate to such matters as I do, so I suppose I should risk (yet again) sounding like a total nutjob and give a sort of overview...
These messages below (and many more) are spam. If not?
I am giving 'nomzz' and 'john.michael60' ONE WEEK to explain. If they are actual people who would like to actually contribute here, and will make themselves known by something other than these very spam-like messages, they can stay.
...If not?
A Sunday morning fastly eroding and soon to be afternoon and it will be once I finish this composition of this missive.

I've been aware of this concept for a while now, and indeed have been in correspondence with inventor Scott Brusaw almost as long.
The concept of Solar Roadways is, in a word, genius.
Rather than attempt to describe it all here, I will direct you to Scott's site: http://www.solarroadways.com/
[more after the jump]